[Poetic
Creating]
A poet’s response, on the page, is like a door with a knocker ready to answer every call, opening the world of pathetic fallacy, his visions and poetic skills — shaping the deep core of truth about [energetic] languages by means of semantics, typography, utterance, aural imagery, images, word plays, aesthetics, etc.
Often, the feeling of writing resembles to “the birds landing on a hangar of relented reality” with the prose unbridled or not, with the sensory end-stopped or not, with an exposure of rhetorical elements shaped to persuade, to argue and to convince. However, a poem should be good enough by moving along as a series of comments, reflections and memories rather than as any argument or interrogation.
Irregularity
in poetic structure may give the language a sense of spontaneous energy, and
however, a stick looks bent when it is put in water — the fact of the Plato’s
refracting reality that is conceived in every inch of poetic language.
